"Retailers cut back on variety, once the spice of marketing" is the Wall Street Journal.com headline.  It seems one of the unintended consequences of this recession will be forced consumer goods innovation!

For years consumer goods companies, and the retailers which push their products, have played a consistent, largely boring, and not too profitable Defend & Extend game.  When I was young there was one jar of Kraft Miracle whip on the store shelf.  It was one quart.  This container was so ubiquitous that it coined the term "mayonnaise jar" – everybody knew what you meant with that term.  Now you can find multiple varieties of Miracle Whip (fat free, low fat, etc.), in multiple sizes.  This product proliferation passed for innovation for many people.  Unfortunately, it has not grown the sales of Miracle Whip faster than growth in the general population. 

Do you remember when you'd go to Pizza Hut and they offered "Hawaiian Pizza?"  Pizza Hut would concoct some pretty unusual toppings, mixed up in various arrangements, then give them catchy labels.  Unfortunately, what passed internally as an exciting new product introduction was recognized by customers as much ado about nothing, and those varieties quietly and quickly left the menu.  Like the Miracle Whip example, it expanded the number of choices, but it did not increase the demand for pizza, nor revenues, nor profits.

Expanding varieties is too often seen by marketers as innovation.  I remember when Oreos came out with 100 calorie packs, and the CEO said that was an innovation.  But did it drive additional Oreo sales?  Unfortunately for Nabisco, no.  It was plenty easy to count out the number of cookies you want and put in a baggie.  Or buy fewer cookies altogether in these new, smaller packages.

These sorts of tricks are the stock-in-trade of Defend & Extend managementClog up the distribution system with dozens (sometimes hundreds) of varieties of your product.  Try to take over lots of shelf space by paying "stocking fees" to the retailer to put all those varieties (package sizes, flavor options, etc.) on his shelf – in effect bribing him to stock the product.  But then when a truly new product comes along, something really innovative by a smaller, newer company, the D&E manager uses the stocking fees as a way to make it hard for the new product to even reach the market because the small company can't afford to pay millions of dollars to bump the big guy defending his retail turf.  The large number of offerings defends the product's position in retail, while simultaneously extending the product's life to keep sales from declining.  But, year after year the cost of creating, launching and placing these new varieties of largely the "same old thing" keeps driving down the net margin.  The D&E manager is trying to keep up revenues, but at the expense of profits. 

Simultaneously, this kind of behavior keeps the business from launching really new products.  The previous CEO at Kraft said in 2006 that the best investment his company could make was advertising Velveeta.  His point of view was that protecting Velveeta sales was worth more than launching new products – and at that time the last new product launched by Kraft was 6 years old!  Internally, the decision-support system was so geared toward defending the existing business that it made all marginal investments supporting existing brands look highly profitable – while killing the rate of return on new products by discounting potential sales and inflating costs! 

This D&E behavior isn't good for any business.  Consumer goods or otherwise.  And it's interesting to read that now retailers are starting to push back.  They are cutting the number of product variations to cut the inventory carrying costs.  As I mentioned, if you now have 6 different stock keeping units (SKUs) for Miracle Whip in various sizes, flavors and shapes but no additional sales you more than likely have doubled, tripled or even more the inventory – and simultaneously reduced "turns" – thus making the margin per foot of shelf space, and the inventory ROI, poorer.  Even with those "shelf fee" bribes the consumer goods manufacturer paid.

For consumers this is a great thing!  Because it frees up shelf space for new products.  It frees up buyers to look harder at truly new products, and new suppliers.  The retailer has the chance of revitalizing his stores by putting more excitement on the shelves, and giving the consumer something new.  This action is a Disruption for the individual retailer – pushing them to compete on products and services, not just having the same old products (in too many varieties) exactly the same as competitors.

This action, happening at WalMart, Walgreens, RiteAid, Kroger and Target according to the article, is an industry Disruption.  It impacts the manufacturers like Kraft and P&G by forcing them to bring more truly new products to the market if they want to maintain shelf facings and revenues.  It alters the selling proposition for all suppliers, making the "distribution fees" less of an issue and turning those retail buyers back into true merchandisers – rather than just people who review manufacturer supplied planograms before feeding numbers into the automated ordering system.  And it changes what the manufacturer's salespeople have to do.

The companies that will do well are those that now implement White Space to take advantage of this Disruption.  As you can imagine, it's a huge boon for the smaller, more entrepreneurial companies that may well have long been blocked from the big retailer's stores.  It allows them to get creative about pitching their products in an effort to help the retailer compete on product – not just price.  And for any existing supplier, they will have to use White Space to get more new products out faster.  And get their salesforce to change behavior toward selling new products rather than just defending the old products and facings.

Markets work in amazing ways.  Almost never do things happen as one would predict.  It's these unintended consequences of markets that makes them so powerful.  Not that they are "efficient" so much as they allow for Disruptions and big behavior changes.  And that gives the entrepreneurial folks, and the innovators, their opportunities to succeed.  For those in consumer goods, right now is a great time to talk to Target, Kohl's, Safeway, et.al. about how they can really change the competition by refocusing on your innovative new products again!