When I was young the word Google meant a very large number in math class.  Today, Google means "to search" – or even more importantly Google represents the latest meteoric growth company.  The interesting question, is Google just lucky (right company in the right market at the right time), or is there something more systematic going on?

It shouldn’t surprise you to hear that I think it is systematic.  Let’s just take a look at Google’s IT department, and you can compare it to the typical department.  Or possibly your own.  (For specifics, go to Information Week article here.)  Look for the White Space to innovate growth, and compare to most IT departments.

Firstly, despite spending 50% of revenues on IT, the company has no CIO or CTO.  Instead, IT responsibility is distributed amongst several Vice Presidents.  The closest thing to a CIO they have is a 36 year old with an undergraduate degree in social and political organizations, then a Ph.D. in Psychology.  So much for the "tech bent" requirement in the role – or in Google.  The fact is, that having distributed responsibility is a Disruptive design element which keeps projects, and people, from getting Locked in

When it comes to managing technology he says "What we put on each desktop is not as important as how we think about what to put on each desktop…choice is always better than controlcontrol gets in the way of innovation….sees a distinction between tools that tell you something and tools that stop you from doing something….I try to control as little as possible."

Google manages engineers with a matrix system.  Employees have mutliple managers, and projects typically last as little as 3 months.  Rather than a "good old boy referral" system for placing people, the project assignment system is automated with AI.  Every person and every project is reviewed, and input is put in a database, and the information is completely available to EVERYONE to see.  That’s right, performance reviews are public knowledge.  Another design element that creates Disruptions and avoids Lock-in.

To encourage collaboration, people stay on projects for only a short time.  And, to keep people talking lunch is free in the cafeteria.  Most people would say that free lunch is simply wasted money.  But then again, most people have never come close to Google’s growth rate.

The fact is, Google is loaded with White Space.  Its organizational structure is designed to constantly Disrupt the way people work and think, by moving them frequently and rapidly across projects.  Feedback is public, so that everyone knows what is working and what isn’t.  AI creates job assignments, rather than people, forcing new collaboration and new insights.  And R&D is not budgeted separately from IT, engineering or product development, in order to keep work and people moving freely and focused upon results rather than myopic projects or budgets.

There is very little "Focus" at Google.  Just dramatic growth, fantastic new product development and introduction, and superb rates of return.