Do you remember when Home Depot was a Wall Street – and customer – darling?  Home Depot was only 20 years old when its incredible growth story vaulted it onto the Dow Jones Industrial Average 9 years ago, replacing Sears.  Unfortunately, that youthful ascent turned out to be the company crescendo.  Since peaking in value within a year, Home Depot has lost more than 2/3 of its value (see chart here).  Things have not been good for the company that "changed the rules" on home do-it-yourself sales.

Along the way, Home Depot changed its CEO a couple of times.  And it opened some White Space type of projects.  But today, the company announced it was shutting down those projects (Expo Design Centers, YardBIRDs, HD Bath) cutting 5,000 jobs - and an additional 2,000 jobs in a "streamlining" efforts (read article here).  In the process, it affirmed revenue will decline 8% this year while earnings per share will drop 24%. 

Amidst this background, the stock rose 4.5%.

Home Depot is a company with a very strong Success FormulaThat Success Formula met the market needs so well in the 1980s and 1990s that the company excelled beyond all expectations.  But like most companies, Home Depot was a "one trick pony."  It knew how to do one thing, one way.  Then in the early 2000s, competitors started catching up.  And Home Depot didn't have anything new to offer.  The market started shifting to competitors with lower price – or competitors with even better customer service – leaving Home Depot "stuck in the middle" decent at both price and service not not best at either.  And with nothing really knew to attract customers.

So Home Depot launched Expo Design Centers.  It was leadership's effort to go further upmarket – to sell even higher priced home items.  This was a failed effort from the start:

  • Leadership did not tie its projects to any committed scenario of the future where Expo would create a leadership position.  There was no scenario planning which showed a critical need for Home Depot to change.
  • Expo did not learn from competitors, nor did it set any new standards that exceeded competitors.  KDA and others had long been doing what Expo did – and even better!  Rather than obsessing about competitors in order to realize where Home Depot was weak, and finding new ways to grow the market, Home Depot decided to launch its own idea without powerful competitive information. 
  • Thirdly, Home Depot did not Disrupt at all.  Although Expo existed, it was never considered important to the company future.  Leadership never said it needed to do anything different, nor that it felt these new projects were critical to company success.  Instead, leadership let all the employees believe these projects were merely trial balloons with limited commitment. 
  • And, for sure, Expo and other projects did not meet the real criteria of White Space because they lacked the permission to violate Home Depot Lock-ins and the resources to really be successful.

Now, years later, with the company in even more trouble, Home Depot is closing these stores.  It appears management is taking a page from Sears – the company they displaced on the DJIA – which closed its hardware and other store concepts to maintain its focus on traditional Sears.  And we all know how that's worked out.  Leadership is wiping out growth opportunities to save cost, in order to Defend its now poorly performing Success Formula, rather than using them to try developing a solution for declining revenues and profits.  So easy to simply quit.  Instead of re-orienting the projects along The Phoenix Principle to try and fix Home Depot, leadership is killing the growth potential to save cost with hopes that some miracle will return the world to the days when Home Depot grew and made above-average returns.

What do Home Depot leaders want employees, investors and vendors to anticipate will turn around this company?  Even though Home Depot was a phenomenal success, once it hit a growth stall it fell amazingly fast.  Not its historical growth rate, nor its size, nor its reputation was able to stop the ongoing decline that befell Home Depot once it hit a growth stall. (By the way,  93% of those companies that hit a growth stall follow the same spiraling downward path as Home Depot).  As Sears has shown, a retailer cannot cost-cut its way to success.  Refocusing on its "core business" will not return Home Depot to its halcyon days.  And these cuts further assure ongoing company decline.