"Rupert Murdoch to remove News Corp's content from Google in months" is the London Telegraph headline.  Claiming that Google gets a "free ride" on the newspaper content, the News Corp. Chairman claims he can block Google from referring his content – and that the conclusion will be bad for Google because it will hurt the search engine's ability to add value.  He also expects that his newspaper and its website will do fine without Google, including doing fine without any Google-placed ads on the newspapers' web sites.

Really.

Ever heard the phrase "cutting off your nose to spite your face?"  It means that you get so mad at something, or someone, that you take a stupid action just trying to get even.  Given the gruffness of Mr. Murdoch, I mashed that phrase up into my own explanation of his threat – that he's trying to bite off his own nose.

There is no changing the shift to on-line news readership.  People will never again return to reading print-format newspapers.  Print demand will continue to decline.  Simultaneously, nobody will revert to searching for news on their own – such as by browsing around any particular web site.  Users now know they can find news with the aid of powerful search engines, like Google, that deliver them directly to the page that tells them what they want to know.  And advertisers now know that they must use services like Google to deliver ads to the pages that present their most likely targets.  Advertisers are not willing to accept "views" alone, now knowing that ads can be targeted to specific readers associated with specific page content.  Those shifts have happened, and are now trends moving forward.  No hoping for "the good old days" will change these shifts.

Google doesn't need the News Corp. newspaper output to succeed as a search engine nor News Corp's pages for its ad placement business.  There is so much access to news, from press releases (source news) to bloggers to other newspapers that any individual news source is relatively irrelevant.  And Google can place all of its advertisers' ads – whether News Corp. makes its pages available to Google or not.

Simply, News Corp. needs Google.  Without Google page referrals, visitors will drop.  Lower visitors means fewer ad views means lower revenue.  No news organization can stand lower revenues.  Simultaneously, News Corp. needs as many advertisers competing for its ad space as possible.  To turn down any ad placement service will only hurt revenues further.

Mr. Murdoch said in the article "I don’t believe the media industry can continue to exist in this way."  He's right.  Media companies are going through a major market shift.  But trying to walk away from the #1 search engine and #1 ad placement company is —– foolish.  And Mr. Murdoch knows this – because News Corp. owns MySpace and other internet properties.  Google may not need News Corp., but News Corp. definitely needs Google